You are correct about "several sweeping statements". Just trying to find out who's who in the zoo here.

If I had said "if you think the markings at Twin Buttes..." instead of, "if the markings at Twin Buttes....", your point would be well taken. I did not make an assertion that you had mentioned the Buttes.
If the Stone Maps are legitimate, it is likely that the markings at Twin Buttes are also legitimate. If Father Rojas made and hid the Stone Maps in his mission, I think we could safely assume he had something to do with the markings at Twin Buttes as well. A foundation of common sense may not have as much stability as a trip to the Jesuit Archives, but it will have to do for most of us. All of the above has absolutely nothing to do with finding the treasure. The entire discussion of Father Rojas has nothing to do with using the Stone Maps to find the Jesuit Treasure. It has, however, been an interesting trip into Jesuit history.

I like all of your assumptions. I may not agree with them all, but I like 'em. You are also very observant. I don't spend any time studying the Stone Maps. Glad you are still working on them.

Joe