Joe,
Thanks for the reply.
Joe Ribaudo wrote:Like Bigfoot sightings, "Waltz" sightings should probably be taken with a grain of salt.
No doubt. That applies to just about every clue regarding the LDM. Are there any clues related to the location of the LDM which are true beyond any reasonable doubt? Part of the problem in locating the LDM is that there are so many clues, many of them contradictory. Any single clue on its own can be torn to shreds by someone with sufficient knowledge and there are many individuals with such knowledge. At this point, I think a heuristic approach is more productive for me, and the map in Glover’s book was merely an example of that approach, not the end all be all, and I have no inclination to defend it as it would serve no purpose.
Joe Ribaudo wrote:If you were sure of your area, would you send everyone and their brother into that area to search, or would you send them to the Bradshaws?
Well, maybe not their brother.

I’m guessing that you meant this as a rhetorical question, but I’ll answer it nonetheless. The answer is: Depends - and I don’t mean the undergarments

If the area in question was a very specific area, then maybe not, but in the broad sense of Gene’s original question, then obviously yes. As for how the question relates to the Waltz sighters, I think I sufficiently addressed that sort of issue above.
Joe Ribaudo wrote:I believe it is very possible the LDM is on the north side of Black Top Mountain. Ruths body was found there; The Cactus Marker takes you there; The Spanish "Hieroglyphics are on the mountain; A decendent of the Peraltas had claims there; The Fish Map takes you there; The Stone Maps take you there; Dale Howard found a cave entrance with gold ore stacked in the tunnel which went towards the north and, a good many knowledgeable people had claims on the mountain.
That is of course if any of those things have any direct bearing on the LDM.
Joe Ribaudo wrote:I can give you many other reasons to believe Black Top Mountain is the location of the LDM.
Please feel free to do so.
Joe Ribaudo wrote:Don't say I never give out any important information. I just did. That's at least as good as: I saw Waltz camped at Indian Spring.
Beyond qualifying that information as your opinion, you also qualified it with “...it is very possible...” In my opinion, those words weaken all the words which follow them. Even so, it appears to me that many Dutch hunters lock onto a particular area or set of clues and it would take divine intervention to dislodge their pet theories.
Most of the world's problems are caused by people who take themselves too seriously.