James,
I did not "imply" anything. My comments were specific.
[Interesting how known liars are now posting "facts" on the LDM Forum, and the yup's and head nodding is universal.]
Those who have lied about me, were "hand led", by me, as to how they could prove the were not liars. They chose not to.
Why you have decided I was referring to
you is a mystery to me.
There are a number of members who are still posting to the LDM Forum.
So far, you are the only one who thinks my comments were directed to James Anderson. No one else has jumped up and said "Hey! Why are you calling James a liar?"
I have no idea what was in my comments that would make you think you were the target. If you tell me why you feel you are the person(s) I was writing about, I can give you some kind of explanation, as to why it is not so.
I understand why you would not want to give out your personal information, as there are some real wackos out there.
"I still don't agree with you on your assessment of your posts and your explanation that their implied meaning should be understood by all unquestionably."
There is an army of folks out there, who "don't agree" with me. Trust me, you will get over it. If you would drag the quote into your next reply, where I explain that my explanation "should be understood by all unquestionably", I will be happy to explain what I actually said.
You have managed to read a lot of meaning into what I have, or have not, said that just aint there. Not to worry, as the army I spoke of likes to do the same thing. How far off base can you be, if you're with an army?

I know, that was really bad.
I don't know if this post will help you get past the "Joe is persecuting me"
syndrome, but I hope so.
My replies here have, mostly been in jest, as I have no idea why you assumed I was talking about you. You have not made that many posts,
so I have no idea where you are coming from.
"You can see, if I have to do that with the three or four hundred other members, it could become cumbersome. I would need to include people like Aurum, LDM.........and all of the other respected members of this forum. I have not called any of them liars, that I know of."
I think it is pretty clear what my point is here. I only mentioned two people, who are fairly well known, and see no reason why that would confuse anyone. I qualified them as "respected members of this forum" to make a point.
You do not need to agree with me. I don't need to agree with you. It tends to make the conversation a little more interesting that way. Two people with opposing opinions also create an atmosphere of learning. I learn from those who explain why I am wrong.
There is no need for you to agree with that.
You might want to read my posts concerning this topic, again. Remove the idea that I am talking about you in my original post. It might make all the difference in the world.
Take care.
Respectfully,
Joe